It's
easy to tell when you're visiting a page or a site created by an
SEO. Titles are nice, URLs are nice, images have ALT tags, and there
is a certain self-consciousness evident in the
links they have made and in the ways they have made them. I am not
talking about intra-site navigational links. I am talking about
the links that are made purposefully by the author of the page.
These links are, I have been asserting for a while now, the important
links on a site, because they reflect the ideas and intentions of
the author. Because blogs and other CMSs automatically generate
the navigational links, Google knows to treat them differently.
What Google is looking for are the choices you
have made when you created your links. This is where you will reveal
wehether you are to be trusted and whether your site contributes
value to the Web, and if so how much. Blogroll links, while more
telling about you and your blog than automatically-generated intra-site
links, are less important to Google (unless they reveal a gross
Trust Violation) than what I am going to call Volitional
Links.
So, let's define that
term.
A Volitional
Link is a link you make from anchor text on your site
to an offf-blog/CMS or off-domain resource that you want to relate
specifically to the anchor text, somewhat less specifically to
the page you're linking from, and still less specifically to your
site. On a blog, they are the links you create within your posts
and pages.
Here's an example from
Google's Inside AdSense
Blog:
When we visit our favorite websites, we have
very little insight into the person who created them other than
recognition of our shared interests. A publisher in India might
own a website about his penchant for classic American cars, and
the majority of his readers might reside in the UK. The beauty
of the Internet is that each web page could have been created
by anyone, anywhere in the world -- and the site's readers are
often as demographically diverse as they are a group of like-minded
people.
This is where AdSense comes in -- publishers can earn money for
something they probably would have done for free, i.e., writing
about subjects they love. Since ads are targeted both to the content
of the page and the location of the user, there are no geographic
limitations on who can succeed. This puts publishers
in the developing world on a near-level playing field with
publishers in the developed world when it comes to earning
money from their interests. We've
heard stories from publishers in all parts of the world about
how AdSense earnings are being reinvested into creating better
websites and content, or spent on life improvements including
new cars, vacations, education and even engagement rings... more
ADSENSE
| ADWORDS
In the
above blog excerpt, there are three text links. Notice how this
Google blogger uses sensitivity to his context, careful selection
of anchor text and carefully selected external resources to enlarge
and clarify the meaning of his own post. This is the sort of example
you want to emulate. This is the sort of thing I see SEOs getting
wrong all the time.
Below
I am going to suggest 2 hyperlinking methods that achieve SEO objectives
and make for good pages and sites.
Why Use a Hyperlink?
1.
To provide a specific or empircal example of the subject
(or "thing") being discussed. This can be a link to "the
very one", as in linking anchor text "Peter
Lorre" to peter-lorre.jpg. Or this can be an example of
kind, as in Peter
Lorre. It is understood that such links should go to Subject
Authorities. This rule may be set aside, however, to bring to light
a new resource not already in the index. But such links should be
used in addition to, not instead of Authority
Links.
2.
To join an "excerpt" to the excerpted original whole.
If I were writing an analysis of the Gettysburgh Address, I would
likely include excerpts from the full text within my own work. It
is logical to expect that a reader of my analysis would appreciate
such an Excerpt
Link. The use of the excerpting practice and of excerpt links
is not only convenient and helpful to the readers of our pages.
It also allows secondary publishers to save space on their own pages
and avoid the unnecessary duplication of resources that are already
in the index.
It is
important to note that the usefulness of excerpting is not limited
to text. We may consider that any "whole" is an excerpt
candidate, so long as the following conditions apply: a) The whole
is either an original or a trusted iteration* (*It is understood
that some high-demand resources will be served by multiple parties.
In such cases, duplication is a service to the community, and the
value of the service is a function of trust.), b) The whole is of
such nature that a "part" of the whole tells something
of the whole, and that the whole will expand meaningfully on what
the part may tell by itself. Unique collections or sets of things
are an example.
Observe,
it is not necessary to be the author or creator of the collected
things to create a valuable resource in its own right. Value exists
in the collection itself, and in the effort implicit in creating
the collection. Of course you must always provide an attribution
link to the source site. Take, for example, a full-text version
of Alice
in Wonderland and a collection of images inspired by the book.
The text you would expect to find easily from multiple trusted sources.
Likewise, an image search
would return many images of illustrations,
paintings and
photos of stage
performances, etc.
Even
when there seems to be an abundance of resources available, we discover
it is still possible to create new resources that are valuable simply
because they increase the usefulness of existing resources or because
they bring a new perspective to them. To continue with the Alice
in Wonderland example, we could conceive of a new resource that
earned its value by joining some of the images returned under "Alice
in Wonderland" to specific sections of text from the book.
There are likely many images in the index that the Spider has not
resolved to a greter resolution than the string "alice+in+wonderland".
To clarify the image for the spider further, either by associating
it more closely to a specific section of the book with anchor text
or by writing a more descriptive ALT tag, is to provide a useful
service.
Conclusion
Don't
lose sight of the fact that you are making pages for people.
I spend a great deal of time talking to the Spider, but have found
it listens best when I speak to it like a human. |