<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Commodity</title>
	<link>http://profitlabinc.com/business/blog/2006/10/04/commodity/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 06:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: MYWORDSONTHEWEB.COM &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The POWER/VALUE IMBALANCE</title>
		<link>http://profitlabinc.com/business/blog/2006/10/04/commodity/#comment-6</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 08:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://profitlabinc.com/business/blog/2006/10/04/commodity/#comment-6</guid>
					<description>[...] My question: Is the commodity value of content still so high that sponsors should preserve the right to dictate exclusive use? It&amp;#8217;s a matter of universal acknowledgement that very few sponsors can afford to buy traffic profitably on the strength of conversions from just their own sites. That is beginning to look like an untenable double-standard. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] My question: Is the commodity value of content still so high that sponsors should preserve the right to dictate exclusive use? It&#8217;s a matter of universal acknowledgement that very few sponsors can afford to buy traffic profitably on the strength of conversions from just their own sites. That is beginning to look like an untenable double-standard. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
